ChatGPT爆火，但是对于它的担忧也随之而来：这项技术会不会导致学术不端？为了避免相关欺骗行为的发生，一些国内期刊对于使用人工智能（AI）写作工具做出规范，要求作者进行声明解释，否则论文等将被拒绝或撤回。
Following the frenzied interest in ChatGPT, OpenAI's highly regarded chatbot, concerns over academic misconduct by using such AI-enabled tools have arisen. To avoid cheating, some Chinese social sciences journals have released instructions on using artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools, requesting authors who use such tools to acknowledge and explain the usage, or their papers will be rejected or withdrawn.
2月10日，中国社会科学引文索引（CSSCI）来源期刊《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》，发布三则关于使用人工智能写作工具的说明：
暂不接受任何大型语言模型工具（例如：ChatGPT）单独或联合署名的文章。
在论文创作中使用过相关工具，需单独提出，并在文章中详细解释如何使用以及论证作者自身的创作性。如有隐瞒使用情况，将对文章直接退稿或撤稿处理。
对于引用人工智能写作工具的文章作为参考文献的，需请作者提供详细的引用论证。
On Friday, the Jinan Journal, included in the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI), announced that any large language modeling tools (e.g. ChatGPT) will not be accepted individually or co-signed. If relevant tools have been used in the composition of the paper, the author should propose the usage separately in the paper, explain in detail how they used them and demonstrate the author's own creativity in the paper. If there is any hidden use of the tools, the article will be directly rejected or withdrawn, read the announcement.
此外，《天津师范大学学报（基础教育版）》也于11日发布相关声明：
倡导合理使用新工具、新技术，建议作者在参考文献、致谢等文字中对使用人工智能写作工具（如：ChatGPT等）的情况予以说明。
我刊会加强对学术论文的审稿工作，坚决抵制学术不端行为，追求基础教育研究的科学性、准确性、完整性和创新性，致力于基础教育事业的发展，进一步发挥好基础教育成果传播和交流的重要载体和平台作用。
Also, Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Elementary Education Edition) on Saturday published an announcement, advocating the rational use of new tools and technologies, and suggesting authors to explain the use of AI writing tools (such as ChatGPT) in references, acknowledgments and other texts.
The journal noted that they will strengthen the review of academic papers, resolutely resist academic misconduct, and seek scientific, accurate, complete and innovative basic education research.
ChatGPT的应用，也在国外学术界引发广泛关注。
据《纽约时报》报道，为了防止抄袭等学术不端行为，一些美国学校“封杀”了ChatGPT。
To battle the plagiarism, some schools in the US have responded to ChatGPT by cracking down, according to the News York Times.
比如纽约市的公立学校，近来断掉了校园内的ChatGPT网络连接，并且表示此举是“考虑到其对学习带来的负面影响”以及“对内容安全准确性的担忧”。其他地区，诸如西雅图等地，也限制了学校和ChatGPT的网络连接。
New York City public schools, for example, recently blocked ChatGPT access on school computers and networks, citing “concerns about negative impacts on student learning, and concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of content.” Schools in other cities, including Seattle, have also restricted access.
美国在线课程供应商Study.com近来调查了1000名18岁以上的美国学生，有关ChatGPT在学习中的使用问题，而结果令人震惊。大约89%的学生表示用ChatGPT写过作业；48%的学生承认用ChatGPT完成过居家远程测验或考试。超过50%的学生表示用ChatGPT写过论文，22%的学生承认让ChatGPT写过论文大纲。
A US’ online course provider Study.com recently asked 1,000 students over the age of 18 about the use of ChatGPT in the classroom. The responses were surprising. Around 89 percent said they'd used it on homework. Some 48 percent confessed they'd already made use of it to complete an at-home test or quiz. Over 50 percent said they used ChatGPT to write an essay, while 22 percent admitted to having asked ChatGPT for a paper outline.
此外，包括澳大利亚、加拿大以及法国等部分学校，也禁止学生使用ChatGPT。
不过也有声音指出，相比于直接封杀ChatGPT，不如利用ChatGPT进行教学，其作为教学工具的潜能利大于弊。
综合来源：纽约时报，Global Times
